[caption id="" align="alignleft" width="300" caption="Image via Wikipedia"][/caption]
Last night someone loaded a Nissan SUV with a bunch of compressed gas and propane and parked it in Times Square,. Apparently the hope was that the SUV would explode and kill a bunch of tourists. Thanks to a tee shirt vendor, who noticed that the vehicle was smoking, who notified a mounted police officer who smelled gunpowder and called for back up, the bomb did not go off, theater goers were not killed, and New York City and the US once again avoided the inevitable terrorists attacks.
That's right. A terrorist attack (whether homegrown or foreign) is inevitable. It will happen at some point. At the same time the Time Square bomb was smoldering, a United Airways plane was being diverted because of a bomb threat now described as a "hoax." The next time the tee shirt vendor might not see the smoke or the threat might not be just some stupid "joke." Just like offshore drilling will inevitably lead to oil spills, US foreign and domestic policies will inevitably lead to terrorist attacks. It is the price we pay for Empire.
When people (usually angry men motivated by fundamentalist religions- Islam, Christianity, Judaism, Middle Eastern or corn-fed white Americans) feel as if their lives have been destroyed by a state and simultaneously feel that there is no possible way to address their grievances, they will feel justified in the use of terror against the population in an attempt to get to the state. It's a story as old as the Maccabees and as new as last night's incident in Times Square. It is the inevitable price that large states that control huge swathes of land and extract wealth from a variety of populations to finance the military might necessary for such control pay. It is a story as old as Rome and as contemporary as America.
That such an attack is unavoidable and will happen we know. What we do not know is how to respond. Inevitably the initial response will be to fight terrorism with violence- more bombings, more arrests, more dead civilians. Here in Waco or there in Kabul.
But that response is neither necessary nor does it produce the desired result: no terrorist attacks. In fact, if history teaches us anything it is that violence begets violence. Instead, it might be worth thinking about other responses. A bomb in Times Square would be a tragedy, with hundreds of civilians wounded and more than a few casualties. But bombing a village in Kabul or having a shoot out with American terrorists in some village in Texas does not lead to less violence. To the contrary, numerous sites exist on the internet that could convince an angry young person to take up arms against a fascist government as a result of the Waco massacre. And even the Army understands that the more civilians die in Afghanistan and Iraq, the more terrorists will be produced.
So the question is, when the bomb finally does go off in Times Square or another airplane is blown up, what should people who actually want a more peaceful world do? The State will attempt to utilize these incidents for more war- because the state extracts huge amounts of our wealth for the military industrial complex and therefore must justify such expenditures to the people. But we the people can prepare now to put pressure on the State not to respond to terrorism with war-like tactics. Instead, we can think about other responses- like pressure on the State to control a smaller amount of territory, to spend less on military and more on the American people (leading to a much less disaffected group of homegrown terrorists), and to generally scale down the size and scope of Empire.
The lessons of a bomb in Time Square are simple: dismantle the military-industrial complex, scale down the operations of Empire, redistribute the wealth from buying swords to making plowshares. It's a lesson as old as Isaiah and as new as last night's bomb in New York.
[caption id="" align="alignleft" width="300" caption="Image by AFP/Getty Images via Daylife"][/caption]
Apparently the Marines already have their orders and are getting ready for 9000 of them so show up in the Helmand province as part of President Obama's 30,000 troop escalation of the eight-year war there.
No surprise there. But listen to the Marine's top officer, Gen. James T. Conway, who said:
Where we have gone, goodness follows," Conway said. "But the fact is that we are not as expansive as we would like to be, and those probable additional number of Marines are going to help us to get there."
Surely goodness and love will follow me all the days of my life, and I will dwell in the house of the LORD forever.
It also just sounds crazy. According to www.unknownnews.net:
At least 753,399 people have been killed in Afghanistan and Iraq since the U.S. and coalition attacks, based on lowest credible estimates.
About 251 times as many people have been killed in Afghanistan and Iraq than in the ghastly attacks of September 11, 2001. More than 108 times as many people have been killed in these wars and occupations than in all terrorist attacks in the world from 1993-2004. The 2004 report showed terrorism at an all-time high, and after numerous experts suggested that the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq were fueling the increase, subsequent reports have remained classified.
And who is Conway to believe that death is goodness? A bit of mucking around reveals a "hero" who has Thanksgiving with
"his troops." But it also reveals that Conway wants to keep gays out of the military (after all, you can't do God's work if you're gay) and a man who was a true believer in the Iraq invasion to find the imaginary Weapons of Mass Destruction.
Just as crazy as a Marine general who believed in WMDs and who believes the Marines bring "goodness" to Afghanistan by killing and maiming is the administration's belief that more war will bring more goodness. At this point, it seems that Obama wants to add about 30,000 more troops and withdraw by 2018.
War till at least 2018? If we continue the wars for that long then millions of people, millions of innocent civilians--children, old people, people who want nothing to do with war and death-- will be dead and many times that number so wounded or so psychologically scarred from the war that they will never be fully able to function again. In other words, they'll be the living dead. As will all those Marines coming back to the US in coffins or in pieces.
Goodness? Godly? Good gods. At this point, the disconnect between reality and policy is so great, the continuation of Dubbya's religious war so clear, that it is impossible to assume President Obama is anything but the most cynical of men. Because unlike Dubbya, who actually believed crazy Christian talk about bringing "goodness/godliness" by killing, Obama is far too smart to believe such stupid things. And so he is only operating out of a misguided sense that somehow increasing war abroad will lead to re-election at home.
But goodness and love will not follow Obama's war in Afghanistan. Instead, more anger against the US, more terrorism at home and in Afghanistan and Iraq, and none of us will even dwell in the House of Reality, let alone the House of the Lord.